If we’re in a recession…

…, why doesn’t anybody want to sell me anything?

So, we are in the market for a new kitchen. Mrs Emu has convinced me that if our children are to grow any taller, we’re going to need a bigger table. A bigger table will need a bigger room, and therefore the house will need to be extended. If we extend the house, we’ll need to rip out the kitchen. So we’ll need another one.

And, with the world tightening its belt, you would think that the easiest thing in the world would be to go into a shop and say something like:

“Good morning, I have been convinced that I need to spend an unfeasibly large sum of money on some boxes to fix to the wall in my kitchen. As a kitchen designer, please can you advise me on what boxes could go where, what components I need to buy, and how your sleek design will make me forget that I’m spending half a year of my salary putting all this in place.”*

Well, you might be surprised. Mrs E and myself have run the gauntlet now of three kitchen suppliers, varying from the disappointing to the infuriating.

Kitchen Company Number One: Had to be chased before he’d deign to visit. Then spent most of the visit telling us how stressful his life was. And how he thought that chasing for a sale was beneath him. And so it proved, as we chased, week after week, for some sort of design or quote. And we finally gave up.

Kitchen Company Number Two: Was part of a big department store chain. Who are supposed to specialise in fitting kitchens. And who charge you for coming to your house to give you a price. Before which, you have to effectively go through a 2 hour ‘consultation’, presumably to ascertain if they are prepared to do business with you. There is quite a strong possibility that I could go off on one here, so to avoid this, I’ll just state that John Lewis kitchens are in debt to me to the tune of 2 hours of my life that I will never, ever, ever have back.

Kitchen Company Number Three. After dragging our way through a couple of presentations on factory build quality and a couple of reasonably challenging home visits, during which the price has at any time seesawed between 50% to 200% of our budget, we now have a reasonable chance of buying a kitchen. So I asked for an itemised quote. Two weeks ago. And when chased, the sales guy says ‘Oh, I haven’t had a look at that for a few days now’. And I’m still waiting…

Maybe this is just a whine, but I fear that it shows a bit of an inherent problem – any one of these businesses could have had several thousand quid from me but decided that they weren’t bothered about selling to us. As it happens, they also managed to wind us up en route with the sort of customer service that Little Britain would struggle to parody.

Hey-ho, maybe I’m just imagining this recession thing, but I’m sure I’ve read in the papers that it’s going to be quite big news next year. And lots of businesses will be put out of action as they won’t be writing any new orders.

And we still need a kitchen.

* of course, you wouldn’t say it quite like this or you’d sound like some sort of Viz character. But you get the picture

Why Marvin Gaye Was A God

When I was a young, easily influenced wannabe musician (well, let’s face it, a wannabe bloke who hung around with musicians), I was convinced that the defining quality of a really good song was the ability to pull it back to a vocal line and one instrument, typically a guitar or piano.

This theory stood me in fairly good stead as it managed to distance me from any prog-rock in the 1970’s. And largely the songs that were around in the 1970’s which sounded good acoustically then, still sound good now. For example, I heard an acoustic version of Whiskey In The Jar the other night that was every bit as powerful as Thin Lizzy, who, I’m ashamed to say, I had always thought wrote the song. And, at the other extreme, if you were to play, say, any song by The Rubettes on any combination of acoustic instruments, they’d still sound, at best, shite.

However, as Rick Wakeman, cape flying, was kicked down the King’s Road by the spit of punk & new wave in the late 70’s, the only thing that really mattered was being in a group. And with some notable exceptions, that’s pretty much the way it stayed, and, because the dynamics of music in groups are so fantastic to listen to and watch, for me they took over, and the ‘strip it back’ test sort of lost its meaning.

And then my friend James sent me this MP3 file, of a single lead vocal track from Marvin Gaye. And listening to it without the song that we’re all familar with makes it even more resonant; I knew he could sing, but somehow the full recording softens the emotion. So, consequently, I’m thinking about going back to basics. You?

Anyway, I’m going back to listen to some delta bluesmen…

A style icon, briefly

Travelled to That London yesterday and visited our shiny new offices in Jermyn Street. If you’ve not been to Jermyn Street, you really should take the time. Some of the shops there seem to have entirely ignored this, all of the 20th and a fair chunk of the 19th century, and are still selling the sort of gear that would suit the….well, the only word I can think of is ‘dandy’.

In fact, really close to our office is a statue of Beau Brummell, a sort of Russell Brand of his day, although obviously without the radio phone-in. Or the hilarious line in wacky mysogynism. Anyway, Beau Brummell is credited with inventing the man’s suit and tie, and much more that passes for western ‘style’. He claimed to take at least 5 hours to get dressed in the morning, thereby beating most other men by around 4 hrs 55min. Anyway, his influence is absolutely felt on Jermyn Street, which has all manner of small men’s outfitters, with the most amazing shirts, socks, cufflinks, waistcoats and dressing gowns on display – hugely desirable and beautifully made, although I suspect they might look better in the window than on the customer. I’ve only just started going past these shops in the last few weeks, and already I have the strangest hankerings for long extravagant socks and a smoking jacket.

So it seems only right and proper to make an effort when travelling to London, as I like to think that life is too short to look scruffy in such historic company. And, this morning, in exceptionally pointy shoes, and overcoat, I will admit that I thought I was cutting rather a dash (as they probably don’t say in the shops around these parts).

So I really thought my time as a style icon had come, when a gentleman in a tweed jacket fell into step beside me as I walked out of the office to get a cab.

(He) ‘Well, sir, it’s not often I see someone as beautifully coordinated as you, looking like a true gentleman, along Jermyn Street”

(Me, slightly worried) “Err, thanks”

(He, beginning to sound like a Lionel Bart character) “Yes indeed, I’m enjoying both the cut of your coat and the point of your shoe”

(Me, slightly alarmed that I might have been selected for some bizarre grooming project) “Err, thanks, you’re very kind”

Of course, at this stage, I was secretly Very Pleased Indeed. At last, recognised as the style icon I’d always hoped to be. Move over, Peter York….there’s a new kid in town and he’s wearing a big brown coat…

This reverie lasted for about 15 seconds, at which point my new friend tried to sell me a copy of The Big Issue. Ho hum.

The fat club

In 2006, the Health and Social Care Information Centre announced that one in four children in England were clinically obese.

From 1995 to 2004, obesity among boys aged 11-15 rose from 14% to 24% and girls from 15% to 26%.

The problem is not just a health and social one, although you would think that this would be enough to spur the nation into some sort of action. It’s also an economic one – currently obesity related illness costs the NHS around £1bn per year, plus an estimated £2.5bn cost to the overall economy. And it doesn’t look as if the problem is going to be easily contained. Here’s an example: while giving blood last week, I was speaking to one of the nurses who had just completed a dissertation on the challenges facing blood donations in 20 years time. He claimed that by 2050, around 60% of the population would be unable to give blood, largely due to obesity related disorders.

Obviously, the factors that contribute to this trend are seen as complex. For kids, they involve social context, diet (der…), lack of exercise in the school curriculum, transport, leisure activities, and so on. For adults, you could take most of these factors and repeat them, plus add a few – worse diets, really sedentary lifestyles, role models, food labelling etc.

The government announcement earlier this year that, having considered this epidemic, it was looking at putting £372m into schemes to reduce the problem should be welcomed, and amongst the plans are schemes to reward overweight people for eating a healthier diet.

Now, there’s a danger that I might come across as a bit of a health militant here, but it just doesn’t seem right that people should get themselves unfit and overweight then be financially rewarded for any corrective measure. I understand that you have to make schemes work, and anything that works to curb this trend should be applauded, but it doesn’t fit with the lack of reward for not making yourself obese in the first place.

To this end, my friend Steve has (largely to his surprise) had a petition accepted on the 10 Downing St petition site. At the time of writing, he has a massive 8 signatures, but given that he’s only told half a dozen people, it’s a start at least. You can see it at http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/healthyrewards/I don’t think Steve has got anything particularly negative to say about the problem, just a view that a positive healthy approach from the start might be a good counter.

And, I know the causes might be complicated, but then so were the reasons that it was so hard to stop people smoking in the UK, and that seems to be going in the right direction. Sometimes simple messages (smoking will deliver to you a lingering and unpleasant death, make your breath stink and turn you infertile) are quite effective. So maybe “take more exercise and eat less” ought to be the mantra for the future.

Not bumping into people

PeoplePosted by kevin Wed, November 26, 2008 22:57:07

My morning run to work goes past three secondary schools. One is the comprehensive that my elder kids go to, the second is a private school for girls, and the third is a huge comprehensive that, until recently, was under special measures and which has made some pretty impressive strides to return to a standard that it enjoyed in the past. Such is the way of the education system, and maybe more of this another time.

The (quite) interesting thing about this route is the way in which the pupils interact as they go to school. I tend to overtake the first crowd of children as they gather a larger and larger numbers, the closer they get to their destination, which is either the school gates, a side alley for a quick fag, or the sweet shop. This is a particularly useful route as it allows me to catch up with my second son, and deliver him the games kit/lunch/coat/book/brain that he leaves in the house at least twice a week. And perhaps because I know some of the kids, I can normally rely on them saying hello if they see me, or commenting on my propensity for wearing either running tights (a source of no small embarrassment to all of my children) or shorts.

A similar reaction from the kids going to the other comprehensive, who I tend to meet, as it were, head on. They’ll say hello, move out of the way if they’re blocking the path, and the particularly cheeky ones will shout out helpful and motivating messages – ‘Nice Legs!’

However, I do get a bit stuck when I have to run past the private school. None of these kids, it seems, walk to school. Fair enough, because of its nature, you expect most of them to travel in, but moving along the pavement is a constant hassle as the big doors of the Chelsea Tractors open without warning, as cellos (why cellos?!) are lumped onto the pavement, and as the girls, four abreast across the pavement and studiously avoiding eye contact, force me to run into the road.

I explained this dilemma to my friend G, who knows about such things, last weekend. Why is it, I asked, that these girls are such snobs that they completely ignore the people around them, and isolate themselves so much from their environment? Aha, she said, it’s a bit simpler than that. Her belief is that the pupils at this school have a life that revolves around school itself, their families, and friends of their families. Everything outside this is another world, and the lack of eye contact signifies nervousness at contact beyond their world, rather than aloofness.

It’s a bit of a shame, as, if G is right, then I shall have to suspend my plans to re-listen to all those Crass albums (maybe not such a shame then) and think about the waste of putting kids into education at massive expense, for them to be so ill at ease with the world around them.

Futurologist not great career choice shock!

When I was at primary school, there was a book that predicted what life would be like in the year 2000. To a 10-year old, the prospect of actually getting to this milestone felt light years away – after all, I’d be 30-something, and that was almost as old as my teacher.

Anyway, the key points I remember in that book were that, by the year 2000,

– we would be travelling in remote controlled cars, into which we simply programmed our destination, and relaxed, thereby avoiding traffic jams and crashes,

– we would take all our meals in pill form,

– we would start inhabiting other planets, starting with pods on Mars, and…

– a loaf of bread would cost more than £1.00

Rather sadly, we appear to have over-predicted on three of these and under-predicted on the negative one. And, this being partly the point of this blog, the person who predicted all this has probably long packed up the Smith Corona and shuffled off to a blissful retirement in the country.

Which brings me to the wonderful world of predicting the future in 2008. And at this point, I’ll point you at almost any one of the excellent ‘Shift Happens’ videos. You might have come across these yourselves, or you might have been told about them by your kids, if you have any – possible proof that most 12 year olds are better informed about the future than their parents. Anyway, this is my favourite:

And all of this is very different from the sort of predictions that we saw in our youth. For a start, this stuff is happening now. These are events that will happen in our lifetime. Secondly, there is a lot less of the fanciful optimism of (say) a remote controlled car, as we’ve got so used to assessment of events as cause and effect. So we see the population of India changing and immediately think about the impact on the rest of the world.

I think the stark difference is that the predictions of yesteryear were cosseted in a world we understood. So the remote controlled car still had wheels, ran on roads, and was probably fuelled by fossil fuels. Our pill meals were probably going to be dispensed three times a day! And because the future these days looks much less constrained by fixed parameters, the prospect of change seems even more of a nightmare.

I wanted to close this with a snappy line about embracing change being the only way forward. I googled ‘embrace change’ to get a bit of inspiration, and found this at the top of the list:http://www.marvel.com/embracechange/ Seems as good a way forward as any…

Guitar solo (pt 2) – R Carpenter says ‘Burn It’!

So, best guitar solo in the world ever* goes to The Carpenters, for a slightly bizarre song; Goodbye To Love. Bizarre, because it really shouldn’t work. The lyric was inspired by Richard Carpenter watching a 1940’s film with Bing Crosby and Basil Rathbone**, in which the lovely (and pre pipe/deerstalker) Rathbone claims to have written a song called ‘Goodbye To Love’. Looking at John Bettis’s lyrics, it definitely feels like it was written especially for Karen C:

“I’ll say goodbye to love, No one ever cared if I should live or die, Time and time again the chance for love has passed me by, And all I know of love is how to live without it, I just can’t seem to find it

So I’ve made my mind up I must live my life alone, And though it’s not the easy way, I guess I’ve always known, I’d say goodbye to love”

The song starts in fairly traditional Carpenters style – soft, sweet, sad, sentimental, soporific, and probably some other words beginning with s. There’s even a clarinet (I think) popping up in the orchestration on the second verse. Then, after a minute or so, a band of angels start harmonising with Karen in a way that only really happens in MGM musicals or Carpenters songs. So far, so standard.

Then, an odd thing happens. Apparently, when they were recording the song, Richard hired Tony Peluzo to play a guitar solo. He recorded something very Carpenters-like, at which point RC said ‘Burn It’. He may well have said ‘Burn It, Man’, but I like to think that no member of the Carpenters family ever got thatcarried away. Anyway, what resulted was the most fantastic guitar solo, with feedback that actually harmonised with itself. And if that wasn’t enough, you get another verse,then just as the angels pop up again, in drives Tony with the real guitar solo.

The Carpenters actually received hate mail when their fans heard this song for the first time; ironic as it triggered off a whole range of pompous power ballads which probably deserved some real vitriol.

Anyway, the point of this is that it shouldn’t work, it does, and because it’s so fresh, and so well executed, it says more than a thousand axe-shredding copyists will ever do. Even if it is by The Carpenters.

*My opinion, and possibly only lasting this week

**They were in the film, rather than sat on the sofa watching it with him

The greatest guitar solo…ever

I hadn’t really thought about blogging guitar solos before, but I just re-heard (and then repeated far too many times) a song on my ipod, and came to the conclusion that it’s just the best guitar solo…ever*

So, where would this feedback-fest monster be? If you look athttp://guitar.about.com/library/bl100greatest.htm,then you might hope the answer was with Jimi Hendrix, Metallica, or (at a push) Dave Gilmour.

But, sadly for all you axe-mania fans, my choice is to be found here…

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=nooeMrCws-A

And, if I get a few minutes in the next couple of days, I’ll tell you why…

*until I hear the next one